Educating 21st-century corporate leaders: eastern and western perspectives

Business Impact: Educating 21st century corporate leaders: eastern and western perspectives

Educating 21st-century corporate leaders: eastern and western perspectives

Business Impact: Educating 21st century corporate leaders: eastern and western perspectives
Business Impact: Educating 21st century corporate leaders: eastern and western perspectives

Introduction by Bodo B Schlegelmilch, Chair of AMBA & BGA, and Alexander G Welzl, President of the China Data Analysis and Research Hub.

Educating the next generation of leaders is a difficult task, and Business Schools around the world carry a substantial part of the responsibility for getting this task right. However, deciding on the right way to educate 21st-century leaders is riddled with uncertainties. 

The Covid-19 pandemic accelerated the digital transformation. For Business Schools, it has opened new and exciting avenues for remote teaching, but also raised uncertainties by calling into question how we teach and what we teach. The digital transformation has also changed the competitive environment for Business Schools, as future leaders can tap into digital educational offers from suppliers around the world. For students, this means more choice; for Business Schools, it means more competition. 

More important than the way of delivering knowledge and skills is what we teach. Content is king, but do we know what future leaders need? What type of knowledge and skills will be critical in solving future societal and business challenges? 

There are new types of jobs on the horizon, but we may also need fundamental changes, affecting the responsibilities and purpose of companies in society. Climate change illustrates the need to move towards sustainable circular business models. 

In light of the profound transformations and grand challenges of world societies and economies – namely anthropogenic climate change, digital transformation, demographic changes, urbanisation, and resource depletion – the skills to be achieved by corporate managers are far from being focused solely on economics. 

This is especially true for CEOs, members of boards and middle-management in multinational firms in manufacturing, the service sector, financial industry, and many other fields of private and public enterprises.

The pandemic is just a prelude, and kind of global stress test for governance systems, societal concepts, economies, and people at the dawn of the worldwide impacts of climate change in the coming decades. 

Against this backdrop, mutual learning is needed. In the end, coming up with novel sustainable lifestyles, governance systems and economic performance cycles is a question of survival for the generations to come.

Managerial capabilities are at the heart of this challenge. Therefore, the question of how Business Schools address their educational responsibility in their curricula, philosophies and core values is of utmost importance. 

Undoubtedly a new balance between competition and co-operation, as well as a sense of the delicate line between legality and legitimacy, is necessary for the coming generations of corporate managers. 

Do western and the Chinese cultures influence education at Business Schools and management styles in different ways? How is the shift to the Pacific region reflected in the development and success of current Business School models? Can we expect a growing importance of innovation in managerial education in Europe, China, and the US in the coming times? 

At any rate, evidence-based development and the innovation of Business Schools will be crucial for the emergence of a planetary patriotism in the 21st century.

Earlier this year, AMBA & BGA, in collaboration with the China Data Analysis and Research Hub (CDA), hosted a webinar bringing together experts from China, Europe and the US to share their experience, visions and ideas on educating 21st-century leaders. 

Here are some highlights from our speakers. 

Lars Y Terenius, European Chair, CDA Scientific Advisory Board (SAB), and Professor, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

If you looked 25 years ahead in a crystal ball, I think you’d find that medicine had changed quite considerably. You would have new information due to machine learning, doctors would look at patients’ symptoms remotely, and there would be new ways to register and tools that people could use at home. I think we will see a revolution in medicine, while another lesson we will learn is the need to think globally. We need to introduce these technologies and work out how to help people in less-privileged countries.

Hong Yongmiao, Dean and Professor, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences School of Economics and Management, Beijing, PR China

Our future leaders and talent need to understand how the digital economy drives changes in the economy and wider society. We need to understand how to maintain steady economic growth in China, while improving income inequality and solving other social problems.  

We also need to learn to compete and co-operate while enhancing a harmonious international community. We would like to have our Chinese students know how artificial intelligence (AI) impacts economy, business, and society, while having an international vision; knowing how to communicate with people from different cultural backgrounds and knowing how to solve conflicts in a way that benefits all parties involved.

Pamela Mar, Executive Vice President, Fung Academy, Fung Group, Hong Kong, PR China

The future of the supply chain is going to be digital, and data driven. You will be able to run it from your dashboard. It’s going to be sustainable and certified. It’s going to be geographically agile and fully traceable from end to end. This is very different from cheap and cheerful, which is what the supply chain used to be.

Gao Xudong, Professor, Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management, Beijing, PR China

We believe in the importance of innovation – we are always improving our capabilities so we seize future opportunities and deal with the challenges.

Wu Xiaobo, Dean and Professor, Zhejiang University Faculty of Social Sciences, Hangzhou, PR China

In China, with the sharing of knowledge and interaction between academia and enterprises, with greater co-operation, we could see China enter the fourth industrial revolution. From catching up, China could move ahead. We will see the restructuring of ecosystems, and very close relationships and interactions between industries and universities. 

Wang Zhongming, Professor, Zhejiang University, and President, Silk-Road Entrepreneurship Education Network, Hangzhou, PR China

In China, we try to do three things among the Business Schools in terms of capacity building. First, it’s about bridging the psychological distance to set up sustainability mindsets and building that into MBA programmes. Second, we try to integrate digital transformation with green development. Third, we empower corporate leaders with sustainable management.

Gunther Friedl, Professor, Technical University of Munich (TUM), and Dean, TUM School of Management, Munich, Germany

We need to shift our educational programme. We take an interdisciplinary approach where we bring together business students with science students, with engineering students – and have them collaborate in interdisciplinary teams to get a better understanding of what is going on in their respective areas.

Amitava Chattopadhyay, Professor at INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France

For us, lifelong learning has become a watch word and it’s something that now cuts across degree programmes and executive education programmes.

We are evolving to say that it is no longer the case that you study for the first 20-odd years of life and then live off that for the rest of your career. Rather, you constantly refresh your life as the world changes.

I think that virtual reality offers a real opportunity to present stories and let students understand them. I think that is a super important learning experience for students.

Josep Franch, Professor and Dean, ESADE Business School, Barcelona, Spain

[In the past] our obligation as Business Schools was not only to play a key role [in globalisation] but to provide education with a global perspective, involve faculty in global issues and to share best practice and experience through international partnerships.

Our students have developed a different set of competencies – more resilience, more crisis management, more living with a distributed team of people. We’ve learned what VUCA really means.

Scott Stern, Professor, MIT Sloan School of Management, Boston, USA

I take a global approach to management education, to make sure that the lessons we are teaching students in one location are adaptable and have a broad framework that can apply across many regions. We need to make sure that we’re not putting a square peg in a round hole by misapplying what might be true in one location to another around the globe.

Srilata Zaheer, Dean and Professor, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, USA

We have a range of partnerships, and each one of them has been hugely beneficial in terms of being able to bring views from around the world into our own classrooms for our own students. 

These partnerships have exposed our own American students to what happens around the world and what happens in China – to the best thinking and the best students out there. That has been an absolute joy. 

It has changed how our faculty think and what they teach, it changed what they do.

Bodo B Schlegelmilch, Chair of AMBA & BGA

VUCA has become the norm – the traditional Business School model is undergoing changes. It is very important to come together and focus on ideas we have in common and exchange ideas, so it is a great pleasure to bring together Chinese and western perspectives, because knowledge is much more evenly distributed than ever before.

We have to think about whom we should collaborate and compete with, to the extent that we have to question our own business models. In terms of changing technology, Business Schools, and deans in particular, are taxed with very new decisions, as regards which technologies to invest in. 

  • What do we outsource or invest in ourselves? 
  • What are the teaching tools? 
  • What about the personalisation we offer? 
  • These are all challenges deans did not have before.

Alexander G Welzl, President of CDA

As an independent, non-partisan senior European think tank, we are convinced that the education of the coming generation of managers and corporate leaders is decisive for tackling the challenges lying ahead of us. 

We deeply believe that evidence-based decision-making, and a systemic and systematic learning process between cultures and nations, are the basis for peace, prosperity, and collaboration in the 21st century.

We at CDA are convinced that the future route to go is that we all try together to develop planetary patriotism and a planetary awareness, and this is especially necessary, from our point of view, for future leaders and corporate managers.

This article was originally published in the print edition (May 2022) of Ambition, magazine of the Association of MBAs (AMBA).

Read more Business Impact articles related to business school strategy

Business Impact: Overcoming adversity to serve the business community
business school strategy

Overcoming adversity to serve the business community

Ukraine’s MIM Business School is overcoming the realities of war to continue serving its business community and training its leaders to build a brighter future. President Iryna Tykhomyrova tells Tim Banerjee Dhoul about the reinforced sense of responsibility that is felt by both the school and its students

READ MORE »

Download the latest edition of the Business Impact magazine

Want your business school to feature in
Business Impact?

For questions about editorial opportunities, please contact:

Tim Banerjee Dhoul

Content Editor
Business Impact

Tim

Share this page with your colleagues

Innovating for success in business education

Business Impact: Innovating for success in business education

Innovating for success in business education

Business Impact: Innovating for success in business education
Business Impact: Innovating for success in business education

The world of business education looks very different to the way it looked at the beginning of the pandemic, with remote learning becoming a new normal.

Just like businesses, educational institutions have had to adapt in order to comply with lockdown restrictions, while maintaining a quality service. Although this has been challenging, Covid-19 has created opportunities for digital innovations within Business Schools and wider education.

Digital technology has played a vital role for faculty and students alike. Platforms such as Zoom and Teams have replaced the traditional classroom, and the tech industry has been quick to come up with solutions. From startups to multinationals, these companies are working to improve the world of online learning, developing education technology at a rapid pace. 

This gives Business Schools an opportunity to reflect on how innovations will affect the day-to-day delivery of teaching going into the future. It falls on Schools to continue to be flexible and to adapt to the post-Covid-19 world, taking the valuable skills and lessons learned and developing them further.

Adapting to the digital landscape

In a session at the AMBA & BGA Business School Summit 2022, a panel of experts pondered the future of Business Schools in the digital landscape, and discussed how leading Schools should position themselves in a changing environment.

Kicking off the conversation, Simone Hammer, Head of Marketing for Learning Experiences at Barco, commented that although ‘lots of organisations tried to “run faster” during the pandemic’ others took the opportunity ‘to step back and analyse, without getting exhausted. In saying that, innovation and creativity come out of urgency’, she pointed out.

Tiffany Monaco, Global Business Development and Innovation Leader at IKEA Retail (Ingka Group) highlighted the move to partnership working. ‘The world changed very quickly last year, but if we want to change the way we work by 2030, we need to take action now,’ she said. ‘This pandemic has also sparked a lot of collaboration. Boredom demands creativity, so in the past two years, I’ve had more collaboration and more creativity with my colleagues.’

Meanwhile, Miika Makitalo CEO of HappyOrNot, explained that, in his opinion, the pandemic has revolutionised the behaviours of consumers. ‘The pandemic gave us the opportunity to stop asking “what is the winning strategy?” We’ve been building a clear focus on what we’ve been doing and asking how we can add more value,’ Makitalo added.

‘By combining data and partnering with other organisations, we’ve explored things we’ve never experienced before. We had more time to think, more time to focus and more time to collaborate. In the marketplace, the ones that are innovating are winning.’

But Makitalo stressed that ‘there is great value in failure. Success is a terrible teacher. We have always had an upward trajectory of profit, which started to plateau, so we began to shift our way of thinking and boost innovation. I would say there’s always room for improvement in terms of how organisations approach failure, but having psychological safety and empowering people to be humble is really key. That mitigates risk. 

‘If you’re afraid to embrace your failure, you’re more inclined to hide it and this leads to a snowball effect. Instead leaders can create a culture of accountability; embracing failure; and moving on.’

Hammer advocates asking for help and nurturing a culture of trust. ‘Looking out for collaboration – next to failure – is really important’, she said. 

Maria Luciana Axente, Responsible AI & AI for Good Lead at PwC, concluded: ‘Finally something has happened that we’ve been predicting for a long time. For years, we’ve been preaching to our clients that they will have to digitise. Before the pandemic organisations could cover their lack of digitisation with people skills, but now there is a huge opportunity to develop digital infrastructure. 

‘In the uncertainty that will follow the pandemic we have an opportunity to optimise our processes. Digitisation can replace repetition and empower innovation. No innovation can be realised without infrastructure, and this allows us to make a sustained and profound impact.’ 

Chair
Simone Hammer, Head of Marketing, Learning Experiences, Barco

Panellists
Maria Luciana Axente, Responsible AI & AI for Good Lead, PwC
Tiffany Monaco, Global Business Development and Innovation Leader, IKEA Retail (Ingka Group)
Miika Makitalo CEO, HappyOrNot

This article is adapted from one which originally appeared in Ambition – the magazine of the Association of MBAs.

Read more Business Impact articles related to innovation:

Business Impact: How space can fuel innovation on Earth
innovation

How space can fuel innovation on Earth

How the space economy can help business schools advocate for purpose-driven startups and sustainable business practices. Rana Sobh, dean of the College of Business and Economics at Qatar University, on the winners of the Global Space Sustainability Challenge

Read More »

Download the latest edition of the Business Impact magazine

Want your business school to feature in
Business Impact?

For questions about editorial opportunities, please contact:

Tim Banerjee Dhoul

Content Editor
Business Impact

Tim

Share this page with your colleagues

Sustainability: understanding and broadening awareness in business 

Business Impact: Sustainability - understanding and broadening awareness in business 

Sustainability: understanding and broadening awareness in business 

Business Impact: Sustainability - understanding and broadening awareness in business 
Business Impact: Sustainability - understanding and broadening awareness in business 

Sustainability and CSR is an approach to the management of organisations which is focused on long-term economic, social and environmental value.

It is a response to the challenges of the modern world facing organisations from all sectors, and people from all walks of life.

A business can be a force for good if its purpose is not just about the bottom line, and it is willing to serve its community and satisfy societal needs sustainably. There is a growing consensus that business leaders have a responsibility not only to shareholders, but also to wider society: customers, employees, suppliers, communities, and the environment. But how does this affect business education? Understanding the impact of decisions and barriers to progress are steps in the right direction towards the development of sustainable and socially just economies.

Today’s leaders are in a privileged position, as technology and their global reach give them more power to create social and sustainable value than ever before. A movement for a green-based recovery that will deliver superior returns over traditional fiscal stimuli has gathered real momentum.

Embracing sustainability

During a panel discussion at the AMBA & BGA Business School Summit 2022, two leaders who are making real change in their technology-driven organisations discussed how they think organisations need to respond to the climate crisis. 

Chairing the session, David Woods-Hale, Director of Marketing and Communications, AMBA & BGA, set the scene in his introduction: ‘If COP26 taught us anything, it’s that the solution to the climate emergency is not going to lie solely with politicians or individuals – a big part of it has to come from businesses. Those who are in business schools now, doing MBAs or postgraduate qualifications, are going to be the people coming into organisations and making the difference.’ 

He went on ask the panel what they thought would be the triggering point for all business to become more sustainable. Currently, despite the bleak news surrounding the climate emergency, many organisations are still slow to develop sustainable practices. 

Rita Monteiro, Head of Net Zero Programmes at Amazon, tackled the question first: ‘I think sometimes we look at sustainability in very specific verticals, but we need to look at it more holistically,’ she said. ‘The public and private sector need to come together to accelerate the technologies that we need to decarbonise. 

‘It’s not just about new leaders that are coming into business. Of course, the new generation has much more of an awareness around sustainability and social responsibility – which is great because it will become part of the DNA of ethical business behaviour. But there also needs to be the realisation in tenured leaders that sustainability is about innovation, and it is about survival.

‘Even if someone refutes the science (which I would be very surprised about) sustainability is about survival; you have to make the change to survive. Businesses are having to make that shift. I would be happy to see more policy, as it helps to bring everyone forward together at the same level. It’s not about independent action but consolidated work,’ Monteiro concluded.

Adam Hall, Head of Sustainability at Internet Fusion Group, added his own thoughts to this. ‘You also need to see that action from customers,’ he said. ‘They need to support responsible businesses to keep that momentum going. But I strongly feel that business should take the lead here.’

Wrapping up the session, Hall gave advice to organisations on how business should connect with climate change: ‘Sustainability has to be delivered across all departments,’ he argued. ‘It is not one department that delivers it for everyone. In most situations, it’s the co-ordination of multiple departments trying to make their elements more sustainable. We need to change the perception of sustainability, it’s a practical function of a modern business. Operational efficiencies come along with sustainability, as well as cost savings. 

‘Sustainability needs to be delivered through practical and pragmatic efforts that are put across very simply, he continued. ‘I think one of the areas we are not great at is trying to make this realistic and achievable. We are guilty, as a sustainability community, of using terminology and explaining it in complex ways – it shouldn’t be, it must be recognisable in every single department. For us to really get some momentum going, sustainability has to be understandable, communicable and achievable.’

Adam Hall, Head of Sustainability, Internet Fusion Group
Rita Monteiro, Head of Net Zero Programmes, Amazon

This article was originally published in the print edition (April 2022) of Ambition, magazine of the Association of MBAs (AMBA).

Read more Business Impact articles related to sustainability:

Download the latest edition of the Business Impact magazine

Want your business school to feature in
Business Impact?

For questions about editorial opportunities, please contact:

Tim Banerjee Dhoul

Content Editor
Business Impact

Tim

Share this page with your colleagues

How business schools can bridge the political divide: part II

Business Impact: how Business Schools can bridge the political divide

How business schools can bridge the political divide: part II

Business Impact: how Business Schools can bridge the political divide
Business Impact: how Business Schools can bridge the political divide

From pressures to address environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, to how we deal with climate change, to the rise of what some have called ‘political consumerism’, to the changing nature of globalisation due to new geopolitical tensions, political questions are increasingly integral to continued business success.

ESG modules are insufficient

Yet, layering ESG modules onto business-as-usual curricula, as many schools do, is an insufficient response. ESG is but a part of the political aspects of business, aspects that go much deeper to reach the very way we conceptualise what business is all about.

If students go away believing that it’s ok to keep thinking how we’ve always thought, keep doing what we’ve always done, and that today’s context asks only that businesses are a little bit nicer about it and tick all the boxes around ESG, then these modules could end up doing more harm than good.

In today’s new era, businesses must accept that they are part of our panoply of political institutions and to become increasingly reflexive about their political roles. This requires a deep understanding of the political way of thinking and its incorporation into all aspects of business purpose, strategy and operations. Business school students need to be prepared for this new reality.

Politics drives performance

Let us look at some examples of how political thinking is driving business performance. When former US President, Donald Trump, slapped tariffs on imported steel, Harley-Davidson (Harley), an icon of US manufacturing, decided to shift some of its production out of the US – a business decision. US workers were going to lose their jobs. 

One worker, interviewed by the media during this process, understood that he might lose his job and was asked whether he thought Trump had made the wrong decision in imposing tariffs (the business view). His response surprised the TV interviewer. ‘Yes, I know I might lose my job. But it was still the right decision. We must stop others exploiting America through unfair competition.’ 

His ire, in as much as there was any, was reserved for management rather than Trump. At the time, the Financial Times also interviewed a number of Harley employees and, in June 2018, reported: ‘Many of Harley’s own employees, interviewed this week in the Financial Times, said they supported Mr Trump’s policies.’

Why? Getting back to our previous quote, from the University of Edinburgh’s Christina Boswell, politics is about, ‘tapping deep-rooted values and beliefs, rather than invoking objective self-interest’. Trump tapped those values whereas management might have imagined that the workforce would blame the President for a bad decision while considering their own decisions perfectly ‘rational’. A perfect example of the difference between thinking in narrow financial terms and thinking politically. What seems right from one perspective seems utterly mistaken from another.

In the Harley case, so-called ‘business-focused decisions’ went against the value system of its employees. In other cases, employees’ political views end up driving business decisions. In 2018, Google took itself out of the Maven contract with the US Department of Defense after a staff outcry against the company agreeing to let its AI technology be used for military purposes. Yet more politics. Dropping out of the contract put paid to potential future work that could have earned Google some $10 billion USD over a decade.

Earlier that year, employees at both Microsoft and Salesforce had protested against their companies’ work for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in opposition to President Trump’s policies that separated children from their parents. 

Microsoft CEO, Satya Nadella (an MBA alumnus of the University of Chicago Booth School of Business) issued a memo to employees with an explicitly political title: ‘My views on US immigration policy.’ In it, he denies that Microsoft was working on anything that related to the child separation policy. 

The memo opens with politics: ‘Like many of you, I am appalled at the abhorrent policy of separating immigrant children from their families at the southern border of the US.’ He went on to describe the government policy as ‘cruel and abusive’.

These are examples of a reactive approach to political issues. Managers are forced to address political questions related to their businesses because of employee pressures. Others react to investor pressure. Others still are finding that, in what has been described as a ‘politicised brandscape’, their customers are choosing brands based on the political meaning – is it ‘green’, does the supply chain use forced labour, is the company contributing to social wellbeing?

Some companies and brands have had political thinking embedded within them for some time, maybe it has even been the basis on which they were founded. Patagonia, for example, was founded on the basis of a love of the outdoors and the consequent environmental activism of its founder, Yvon Chouinard. Environmental politics is built into the company’s DNA.

Patagonia runs regular events in its stores, focused on environmental issues, and supports the production of activist films. It focuses obsessively on reducing its environmental footprint from how it manages its supply chains to a focus on the durability of its clothing to reduce over-purchasing and consequent waste and resource use – a stance that is, or at least was, nigh-on heretical in the fashion business. 

It has launched a programme called Worn Wear, encouraging its customers to buy used clothing rather than new and offering to fix worn clothing for nothing to discourage people from buying new. It ran an initiative that connected its customers to environmental groups. Patagonia has even refused to sell its clothing to corporations that do not prioritise the planet.

In 2017, when former President Trump decide to shrink the size of his predecessor President Barack Obama’s national monuments, Patagonia’s website was changed to feature an explicitly political statement upfront which declared ‘The President Stole Your Land’. During the 2020 US election campaign, Patagonia doubled down on its political assault on climate deniers by adding labels to a line of shorts stating, ‘Vote the Assholes Out’. The tagline was not new, but it had particular relevance during the 2020 election. Pictures of the hidden label went viral on social media and the politically labelled shorts sold out in no time.

These are only a few examples. From the geopolitics of operating in China, to the politics of climate change, to diversity, human rights, and many other issues, politics is becoming all pervasive.

How some business schools are adapting

In the era of the new political capitalism, business schools can no longer afford to ignore the intimate interrelationship between business and politics. Their duty is to prepare students for the reality of the world they will be operating in once they leave the sheltered world of academia. And some are stepping up.

Stockholm Business School and Copenhagen Business School offer courses on business and politics. HEC Paris has recently announced a collaboration with Sciences Po to bring expertise on geopolitics to its business teaching. Others are also moving in this direction.

To address the relationship between politics and business, Business schools need to go beyond layering ESG perspectives onto standard business thinking. What is required is a wholesale re-think of how the very concepts of ‘business’ and ‘markets’ are looked at.

Markets, local or global, are political constructs, not economic or commercial constructs. This is because markets as we know them cannot operate without a set of rules that are politically determined and that chime with prevalent social mores. The fiction of the ‘free market’ must be banished from business teaching.

Similarly, the fundamentals of what a business is and what business is for also need to change. The shareholder value model is past its sell-by date. The role of business is, like all other institutions, to participate in the process of creating a better society. What that looks like is politically determined.

Politics, therefore, is not an optional add-on to standard business teaching much like, for some companies, going green is just a thin veneer layered onto business-as-usual. Politics needs to permeate every aspect of business school curricula and give students a true picture of what the 21st century business environment looks like. Hint – it’s deeply political.

This is the second of a two-part series. For a fuller understanding of the roles of ‘politics’ and ‘business’ in our societies, please click here to read the first part of the series.

Joe Zammit-Lucia is the author of The New Political Capitalism (Bloomsbury, February 2022). Following an executive career in multinational business, he founded a management advisory firm with offices in Cambridge (UK), New York and Tokyo. On divestment, he co-founded the RADIX network of public policy think tanks.

This article originally appeared in the print edition (February 2022) in Business Impact, magazine of the Business Graduates Association (BGA).

Read more Business Impact articles related to geopolitics

Download the latest edition of the Business Impact magazine

Want your business school to feature in
Business Impact?

For questions about editorial opportunities, please contact:

Tim Banerjee Dhoul

Content Editor
Business Impact

Tim

Share this page with your colleagues

How business schools can bridge the political divide: part I

Business Impact: How Business Schools can bridge the political divide

How business schools can bridge the political divide: part I

Business Impact: How Business Schools can bridge the political divide
Business Impact: How Business Schools can bridge the political divide

The cultural gulf between business and politics remains wide and persistent. ‘Business is business and politics is politics and never between shall meet,’ according to American journalist, Suzy Welch. Yet this perspective is not only outdated, it has also never been true.

Traditionally, business schools have operated in disciplinary silos and the disciplines that have been brought to bear on business education have not included politics. Harvard academic and management guru, Tom Peters, explained in a 2021 Financial Times article how he was ‘angry, disgusted and sickened’ at how McKinsey & Co., his first employer, and its army of clever MBAs ended up paying nearly $600 million USD for their part in the US opioid scandal: ‘Business schools typically emphasise marketing, finance and quantitative rules. The “people stuff” and “culture stuff” gets short shrift in virtually all cases.’

Politics is what people stuff and culture stuff is all about, yet many business schools continue to have a kind of blind spot about the close interrelationship between business and politics. This blind spot carries through when students embark on their business careers. One chair of a major multinational company had just come from a meeting with fellow chairs when we met for a coffee and a chat. He told me: ‘We were discussing politics. We came to the conclusion that politics operates to a totally different logic from business. And, quite honestly, we don’t understand it.’ 

This put me in mind of CP Snow’s renowned 1959 Rede Lecture on the divide between art and science [as published in the 1961 book, The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution]: ‘I felt I was moving among two groups – comparable in intelligence… who in intellectual, moral and psychological climate had so little in common that instead of going from Burlington House or South Kensington to Chelsea, one might have crossed an ocean … They have a curious distorted image of each other. Their attitudes are so different that, even at the level of emotion, they can’t find much common ground.’

Why does this gulf exist? Is Welch right that business and politics should never meet? Or, by ignoring political issues, are business schools leaving a huge and important gap in fulfilling their educational duties? 

To explore these questions further, we need to understand what we mean by ‘politics’ and what we mean by ‘business’, and their roles in our societies. 

What is politics?

It is often thought that ‘political’ equates to partisan politics, the increasingly grubby nature of political campaigning, or the shady world of lobbying for self-interest. Yet politics is not that. 

Politics is the mechanism by which we decide collectively the kind of society in which we wish to live. That is something in which every one of us has an interest and about which we have views – often visceral and strongly held. Politics is ‘a great and civilising human activity,’ as Bernard Crick put it in his seminal work, In Defence of Politics. Crick argues that establishing a functioning political order that recognises different views, different preferences and even different truths, marks the birth, or recognition, of freedom.

Politics is about people’s belief systems. ‘Politics is a battle of ideas, in which participants attempt to control the narrative through tapping deep-rooted values and beliefs, rather than invoking objective self-interest,’ says University of Edinburgh Professor, Christina Boswell, in a 2020 blog for the British Academy. In this reading, politics is primarily about identity and culture. People develop political views and allegiances based on their own visions of themselves – much as they choose some brands in an attempt to make a statement about who they are rather than for the brand’s functional value.

Taking these definitions and perspectives, it is clear we all have political interests. We all care about the kind of society in which we live. Given that, how come so many businesses continue to declare themselves to be ‘apolitical’, seemingly trying to absolve themselves of any role in how our societies work? How is it that so much business education continues to ignore politics? 

What is business?

To get to business, let’s start with economics. There was a time when economics was recognised for what it is – a branch of politics. There is no economic theory or decision that is not political in nature which is why we all used to talk about the political economy. All the great economists, from Adam Smith to Karl Marx to JM Keynes, had political thought as a central part of their economic work. 

All of this was swept away when economics developed ‘physics envy’ and wanted to turn itself into a mathematical science. Neo-classical economics dismissed social, political and institutional factors (things not easily subject to turning into elegant mathematical equations) as being ‘exogenous’ to how markets operate, rather than accepting that they are integral to how markets function. 

The fiction of ‘homo economicus’ took off and the narrative around human beings was turned into one of a bunch of automatons making so-called ‘rational’ decisions based on their own economic self-interest. In other words, economics was extirpated from the political context in which it belongs.

Where economics went, business followed. The artificial (and highly damaging) separation carried through to business thinking, which saw itself as belonging in the economic realm rather than the political realm. Over time, neo-liberal economic thinking infected the business perception of itself and its role in society. Milton Friedman’s seminal 1970 article, ‘The Social Responsibility Of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’, poured scorn on the idea that business had any wider responsibility to society other than making money for shareholders. This idea spread like wildfire. It was welcomed by the business community because it simplified their lives, giving them a single target to work towards – shareholder value. Eventually, the idea became embedded in executive compensation programmes and linked exclusively to short-term stock price performance.

A number of business school curricula are still stuck in this paradigm – highly damaging and outdated as it is. The job of business is to maximise profit and deliver money to shareholders, many still claim.

The world has changed

Economist and former Dean of the University of Oxford’s Saïd Business School, John Kay, puts it like this in a 2021 article for Prospect magazine: ‘Business has lost political legitimacy and public trust by pandering to an account of itself that is both repulsive and false. The corporation is necessarily a social institution, its success the product of the relationships among its stakeholders and its role in the society within which it operates.’ 

This perverse view that business has of itself is the legacy of neoclassical and neoliberal economic thinking – thinking that has also caused huge social, environmental and economic damage and that none of us, including business schools, can afford to continue to perpetuate.

Things are changing. Fast. We are entering a new era – what I describe as ‘The New Political Capitalism’. It is an era in which business is rightly seen as being embedded in our social fabric. Where businesses recognise that they are political actors, through their power and their capability of having a significant impact on the sort of societies we live in. 

(This is part one of a two-part series. Please click here to read the second part.)

Joe Zammit-Lucia is the author of The New Political Capitalism (Bloomsbury, February 2022). Following an executive career in multinational business, he founded a management advisory firm with offices in Cambridge (UK), New York and Tokyo. On divestment, he co-founded the RADIX network of public policy think tanks.

This article originally appeared in the print edition (February 2022) in Business Impact, magazine of the Business Graduates Association (BGA).

Read more Business Impact articles related to geopolitics

Download the latest edition of the Business Impact magazine

Want your business school to feature in
Business Impact?

For questions about editorial opportunities, please contact:

Tim Banerjee Dhoul

Content Editor
Business Impact

Tim

Share this page with your colleagues

Looking to the future: the move towards lifelong learning

Business Impact: to the future: the move towards lifelong learning

What skills are organisations looking for in the talent they employ, and how can Business Schools instil these?

Business and the labour market changes continually, as do individual career paths. In a volatile world, even MBAs are challenged to keep abreast of the trends and issues, and ensure they are nurturing and enhancing the skills they need to succeed in their career trajectories. 

There are many opportunities for Business School professionals and students to further their knowledge and develop the skills they need in their chosen professions and throughout life. And with countless learning and development (L&D) opportunities available in a saturated market, students need to embrace learning from other facets of life that can be integral to their growth. 

Knowledge can be acquired, and skillsets developed, anywhere in everyday life. Lifelong learning requires a positive attitude towards both personal and professional L&D. 

Lifelong learners are motivated to develop because they want to better themselves continuously, and this mindset needs to be acknowledged by education providers. So how do Business School leaders provide lifelong learning to their students and community?

Learning to manage knowledge

In a session of the AMBA & BGA Business School Summit 2022, four business experts – all passionate lifelong learners themselves – came together to share their expertise in ongoing learning, and how this impacts their search for talent. 

Session chair Robin Gibson, Marketing Director at Kortext, started by pointing out that having four different countries represented on the panel (with many more watching) ‘attested to the change we have seen in the past couple of years alone. It really re-enforces the question of ‘why lifelong learning is so important in the current climate’ he said.

Tim Ackermann, Director of Global Talent Acquisition at Oda, addressed this important question by noting the speed at which knowledge moves. ‘If you look at the engineering and technical degrees, up to half of your knowledge is already outdated when you end your degree,’ he pointed out.

‘Not only do you need to upgrade your knowledge and skills, specifically, in higher education,  I also think it’s important to understand how to manage knowledge, and how to manage teams. You need to find a passion for moving into different areas of knowledge. Even in today’s climate, it’s valuable if you have switched disciplines because everything’s becoming more interlinked.’

Gibson turned to Heini Utunen, Head of the Learning & Capacity Development Unit of the Health Emergencies Programme at the World Health Organization (WHO), to ask how her organisation copes with the speed at which knowledge evolves, and whether people inside her organisation have a genuine thirst for knowledge.

Utunen responded that, for the most part, they do, explaining: ‘It’s both personal learning, but also that broader learning in the professional areas, and in the community. 

‘But I think, for us in the sector of health, science is changing. My team provides the support function for that learning intervention and health, so we also need to be abreast of the technologies and how consumers of information change, and this is a constant cycle. This is a constant way in which we must be open-minded and able to come with a solutions-orientated mindset.

‘Many of the professionals today are just problem solvers,’ she added. ‘When this problem-solving, curious mindset is there, the professional background is actually much less important.’

Gibson then turned to Elisabetta Galli, Global Human Resources Business Partner and Learning & Development CoE Lead at Lightsource bp, to ask how candidates’ approach to lifelong learning impacts the search for talent. 

Galli replied that she fully agrees that continued learning is one of the most important issues of the moment: ‘It must be part of the natural attitude of the talent we are looking for in the marketplace, much more than their technical skills’ – adding that ‘the culture of the company, the values, and this new organisational empathy require different attitudes’.

‘The talent we are looking for need to have strong human values, strong abilities to manage people and to stay close to people, to create and to develop strong relationships with employees. They really need to be able to understand what external customers want and what motivates them.’ 

Galli rounded up the conversation by adding: ‘I think, especially now, what we are looking for in the external talent marketplace is the cultural behavioural fit, on top of technical skills.’

Chair
Robin Gibson, Marketing Director, Kortext

Panellists
Tim Ackermann, Director, Global Talent Acquisition, Oda
Elisabetta Galli, Global Human Resources Business Partner and Learning & Development CoE Lead, Lightsource bp
Heini Utunen, Head of Unit AI, Learning & Capacity Development Unit, Health Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization (WHO)

This article is adapted from one which originally appeared in Ambition – the magazine of the Association of MBAs.

How to further your team’s knowledge with creative business conversations

Business Impact: How to further your team’s knowledge with creative business conversations

How to further your team’s knowledge with creative business conversations

Business Impact: How to further your team’s knowledge with creative business conversations
Business Impact: How to further your team’s knowledge with creative business conversations

Let us assume that business professionals’ conceptions of the world are formed primarily in the following two ways:

(A) By engaging with their environment – in other words, how they experience technical and digital devices, reading books and articles, using some software, googling or writing down their ideas in their everyday life.

(B) Based on their interactions and conversations with other agents – which would include anything from friends, research/study collaborators and programmers, to industry partners, customers and clients.

Taking this as our starting point, it can also be assumed that (B) is strongly dependent on, and influenced by, (A). In other words, (B) can be interpreted to be manifested based on (A) in different scenarios.

It is important to note that the notion business professionals have of the world are the linguistic outcomes of how they conceptualise it. 

Logical analysis of a scenario

To better understand the dynamics involved, consider a professional business meeting between Simon and Ann.

Ann is the CEO of the company, ‘XYZ’, and Simon is the Senior Information Technology Manager at XYZ. Simon’s and Ann’s conceptions are in an important sense shared among them and, accordingly, must be synchronised among them to effectively communicate and interact when they both share their descriptions, justifications, questions, answers, and requests based on their own conceptions.

The two professionals must, therefore, form a mutual understanding of each other’s conceptions if they are to fulfil any communicative/interactive purpose successfully. Such purposes might include negotiating a favourable outcome; persuading each other; jointly investigating an open question; jointly initiating a technical project; jointly explaining an issue; jointly discovering a problem; or jointly making an agreement.

At this point, let’s imagine that the following conversation takes place between Simon and Ann, as part of their meeting: 

Simon: ‘Let’s use Linux in our next project.’
Ann: ‘What is Linux?’
Simon: ‘Linux is a software operating system.’
Ann: ‘Ahhh! Good!’

In this simple scenario, Simon suggests the usage of Linux in one of their future technical projects, and Ann asks about Linux. Ann is looking forward to hearing a description (in the form of a sentence or a collection of a few sentences) from Simon. Responding to her request, Simon describes his conception of ‘Linux’ and, in fact, proposes a definition based on his conception of ‘Linux’.

By interpreting Simon’s description, Ann can conceptualise and recognise that Simon’s conception of ‘Linux’ is highly dependent on his conceptions of ‘software’ and ‘operating system’. She can therefore also focus on making her own conception of ‘Linux’ as well as on developing her existing conceptions of ‘software’ and ‘operating system’.

In fact, Simon’s conceptions here are hierarchically connected to each other. Such a hierarchical (or vertical logical) structure provides a strong logical backbone for the development of Ann’s knowledge of ‘Linux’.

To be more specific about their knowledge, Simon’s – and, subsequently, Ann’s – knowledge of ‘Linux’ is now simply redeveloped, as well as structured, based on the collections of conception involvements and of conception equalities in their minds, as well as on how either of them can declare their conceptions in their other descriptions.

Moreover, in the short conversation above, Simon has expressed the description ‘Linux is a software operating system’ in view of his knowledge – that is, structured and based on his conception involvement. Ann’s knowledge develops as a result and, accordingly, she proposes an extended description of her own conception. 

It can be concluded that there is a dynamic interconnection between the descriptions offered by Simon and Ann. Such a dynamic relationship supports the development of Ann’s knowledge of ‘Linux’, ‘software’ and ‘operating system’ in the future. 

Creative business conversations

It seems plausible that any business professional’s conceptions are the primary units of their knowledge and the basic materials from which their creative ideas are constructed and can be developed. Correspondingly, their conceptions are modelled and hierarchically serialised to shape meanings in their minds. 

In their conversations, business professionals construct their own meanings with regards to their own conceptions. These constructed meanings become reflected in their personal and meaningful understandings. Business professionals must consider such meanings as the active and dynamic processes of knowledge construction. By constructing meanings in this way, business professionals become connected to each other’s constructed models of knowledge. 

In my opinion, a creative business meeting is constructive based on the concepts of ‘conceptual development’ and ‘meaningful understanding construction’. In creative business conversations, meanings are interpreted to be related to the value, authentication, authenticity, and precision of what business professionals express.

Accordingly, the meaning of any conception is highly related to their interpretation, explanation, and comprehension of what has been expressed. In creative business conversations, any business professional must be permitted to express, explain, defend, prove, and justify his/her conceptions. In addition, all business professionals must be allowed to communicate their conceptions to each other, as well as to their community, to move towards the most appropriate meanings and, subsequently, towards the most proper meaningful understandings. 

Farshad Badie is Professor/Lecturer and Postdoctoral Research Centre Coordinator at the Berlin School of Business and Innovation (BSBI). He holds a PhD in human-centred communication and informatics from Aalborg University in Denmark.

Read more Business Impact articles related to soft skills:

Download the latest edition of the Business Impact magazine

Want your business school to feature in
Business Impact?

For questions about editorial opportunities, please contact:

Tim Banerjee Dhoul

Content Editor
Business Impact

Tim

Share this page with your colleagues

Developing a more diverse and inclusive future for all in education and business

Business Impact: Developing a more diverse and inclusive future for all in education and business

Developing a more diverse and inclusive future for all in education and business

Business Impact: Developing a more diverse and inclusive future for all in education and business
Business Impact: Developing a more diverse and inclusive future for all in education and business

The success of business schools is increasingly aligned to leadership efforts to become inclusive and develop a progressive strategy that has diversity at its core. Generation Z is calling for it and, with equality movements such as LGBTQ+ and BLM gaining momentum, it is imperative that business schools continue to meet these demands. Simply put: The winning formula is a diverse one.

Change is happening but at a pace that, historically, has been too slow across all sectors. With the momentum that has been generated, it is vital for schools to prioritise inclusivity or face being left behind.

Schools must look to a mix of backgrounds within their talent pool. Business school leaders, student recruitment, and HR must collaborate to build inclusive strategies that support diversity. This should focus on groups that may otherwise be marginalised.

Creating fair working environments

In an interactive panel session at the AMBA & BGA Business School Leaders Summit 2022, four experts shared their opinions on work that is being done to create, incorporate and develop culture, diversity, and inclusion practices in business schools, while campaigning for fair working environments around the world.

Laura Pacey, Product Director, UK, HE & OUP, McGraw Hill, posed a question to the panel, asking where barriers to the ‘cultural shift’ in business exist, and where the shift should start in order to achieve diversity, equity and inclusion – given that, so far, training programmes have not always been successful. She kicked off the discussion by making the point that ‘we certainly too often think that equity, diversity and inclusion are the same, but there are certain things to address within this definition.’

Sofia Skrypnyk, Head of Equity, Inclusion & Human Rights, C&A was first to share her insights. ‘The best way to fast-track efforts in equity and inclusion is to accept that there are no short cuts and no silver bullets for this agenda,’ she argued. ‘It’s a social justice agenda and requires lasting behavioural change. One of the problems is that in the corporate sector, we’re looking at this agenda as a series of events that are inspirational projects, rather than as a deep-rooted change that takes years. 

‘The field of diversity and inclusion is relatively new, but over the past decade, there has been so much research, and a body of evidence on what works and what doesn’t. We must stop looking for the next hot topic and have patience; we can learn from insights in social science and social change management. A lack of data is a result of inequity, so explore any data that should accompany any intervention that will bring any change you want to see.’

Oluchi Ikechi D’Amico, Partner, Head of Innovation for Strategy & Transactions APAC, Capital Markets, EY, added: ‘One of the big things organisations need to do is focus on inclusion. When they think about diversity, equality, and inclusion they focus too much on diversity –where they are, where they want to get to and the targets they aspire to.

‘Simply put, we need to do more on inclusion, and this goes beyond training. It’s about the DNA of an organisation and belonging. This can be learned but cannot be [taught]. It happens through real dialogue, core values and a need for recognising there is a problem and that something needs to be done about it. Inclusion is something we speak about – but not something we fully understand. If it’s addressed, then we should have a diverse, representative workforce.’

Closing the session, Steve Butler, CEO, Punter Southall Aspire, Author of Inclusive Culture, Advisor to The Diversity Project, and CIPD Academic Member, added: ‘In my sector [financial services], we need to attract a different set of individuals and then create a culture where individuals can progress and train to make it through the organisations into senior roles. It’s a long-term play, but without the efforts we’re discussing, nothing will change.’

Chair: Laura Pacey, Product Director, UK, HE & OUP, McGraw Hill

Panellists: Steve Butler, CEO, Punter Southall Aspire, Author of Inclusive Culture, Advisor to The Diversity Project, and CIPD Academic Member, Oluchi Ikechi D’Amico, Partner, Head of Innovation for Strategy and Transactions APAC, Capital Markets, EY, Sofia Skrypnyk, Head of Equity, Inclusion & Human Rights, C&A

This article was originally published in the print edition (April 2022) of Ambition, magazine of the Association of MBAs (AMBA).

Read more Business Impact articles related to diversity:

Download the latest edition of the Business Impact magazine

Want your business school to feature in
Business Impact?

For questions about editorial opportunities, please contact:

Tim Banerjee Dhoul

Content Editor
Business Impact

Tim

Share this page with your colleagues

How assistive tech can boost accessibility and inclusivity in higher education

Business Impact: How assistive tech can boost accessibility and inclusivity in higher education

Assistive technology can enhance the student experience and help those working with new languages as well as levelling the playing field for those with disability or lack of access, says doctor and entrepreneur, Richard Purcell

‘Assistive technology’ is the term used to describe devices and tools used to increase, maintain, or improve the capabilities of people with disability. This covers everything from low-tech tools, like pencil grips, to more high-tech tools, like speech-to-text.  

That being said, assistive technology is not only useful for those with a disability. Assistive tech can also be an essential aid for people with neurodiverse traits that may affect working memory, concentration, and writing speed.

It can even be used by those who are learning an additional language, or as a productivity tool to enhance a student’s learning experience and educational performance. For example, there are more than 100 studies which say that adding captions (i.e., same-language written translations) to video improves viewers’ understanding of what they see. 

Why do we need assistive tech? 

Around one billion people currently need assistive products, and more than two billion people around the world are expected to need at least one assistive product by 2030, according to the World Health Organisation (WHO).

Up until now, the disabled population has been absent from discussions on education and the practices used to deliver education, resulting in a huge gap. Assistive technology helps to bridge that gap. It reduces the need for formal health and support services, long-term care and the work of caregivers, according to the WHO. Without assistive technology, people are often excluded, isolated, and locked into poverty, thereby increasing the impact of disease and disability on a person, their family, and society. 

For people without disability, technology makes things easier. For people with disabilities, technology makes things possible.’ (From a 1991 IBM training programme.) 

Diversity and inclusion 

Ultimately, assistive technology can be used to level the playing field in higher education, allowing all students, no matter their ability, background, or learning style to thrive and get the most from their educational experience.

It can enable students to take control of their own learning and gain independence in their education. While students with additional needs are often perceived to be at a disadvantage, assistive technology enables them to reach their full potential, thus aiding diversity and inclusion in university settings. 

The more diverse and inclusive environments such as universities, workplaces and governments are, the more society can be pushed towards thinking about issues that might otherwise be overlooked, such as accessibility. Diversity and inclusion drive innovation and create a better world for us all.

What kinds of assistive tech can be used? 

Innovation and progress within assistive tech is happening every day. Just this March, for the first time ever, a project led by the University of Tübingen in Germany has helped a person with motor neurone disease to express himself in full sentences using a new technology that can read his thoughts.

Assistive technologies currently include, but are not limited to, the following. However, please note that new assistive tech is being produced and improved all the time: 

  • Text-to-speech / Speech-to-text 
  • Adjustable monitor arms 
  • Reading pens 
  • Alternative keyboards 
  • Voice recognition 
  • Digital recorders 
  • iPads and tablets 
  • Visual aids, graphic and drawing tools 
  • Electronic spellcheckers 
  • Word prediction software 
  • Visual search engines 
  • Literacy specific software 
  • Educational software 
  • Electronic resources and books 

What are the barriers to assistive tech?  

Almost one billion children and adults with disabilities, and older people, are unable to access the assistive technology they need, according to a 2022 report from the WHO and UNICEF. 

There are a range of barriers to assistive tech in higher education including: 

  • Lack of appropriate staff training and support 
  • Negative staff attitudes 
  • Inadequate assessment and planning processes 
  • Insufficient funding 
  • Difficulties procuring and managing equipment 
  • Time constraints  

These barriers can’t all be overcome at once but acknowledging that they exist and making sure that conversations are being had and action is being taken will ensure we are making the correct steps towards providing assistive technology to those who need it most.  

In the UK, the Disabled Students’ Allowance (DSA) can sometimes be used to cover the study-related costs, such as the cost of assistive tech, you have because of a mental health problem, long-term illness or other disability.

Assistive technology can help to remove the barrier people face in their day-to-day lives. It levels the playing field and allows all students to have access to the same experiences and learning environments. It’s important to remember that all students benefit from a more inclusive environment, and we, as a wider society, all benefit from a more inclusive educational system.  

Richard Purcell is an NHS doctor and entrepreneur, working to develop innovative assistive technologies designed to promote and enable diversity and inclusion in education and the workplace. Richard has established and grown two successful technology companies, Medincle and CareScribe. 

What is the future of bachelor’s degrees in business?

Business Impact: What is the future of bachelor’s degrees in business?

Undergraduate expectations are evolving under the conditions imposed by Covid-19. Business Schools should see this as an opportunity to change their offerings for the better, says Jordi Robert-Ribes, CEO at EDUopinions

The education sector has been vastly impacted by the events of the last year. Whether it’s the increased dependence on online learning or the worsening economic forecast, student and graduate life has been altered drastically by the pandemic. Inevitably, this has also triggered a shift in student concerns and priorities. As institutions adapt to a ‘new normal,’ students have had their first taste of hybrid learning, and are discovering the pitfalls and benefits of it. Additionally, students that are now graduating into a challenging jobs market are re-evaluating which skills will help them to seek employment. 

This shift in student perspectives is undeniably a challenge for Business Schools and their offerings at the undergraduate, or bachelor’s, level. As such, a reimagining of the traditional bachelor’s programme may be necessary to live up to new student expectations. But what will the future of bachelor’s degrees in business and management look like? To explore this, it’s necessary to examine how student demands are changing and what institutions can do to adapt to shifting priorities. 

The pandemic’s impact

The greatest change to bachelor’s degrees over the last year is a direct result of the pandemic, and that’s the increase in online learning. The speed at which institutions were forced to transition to online learning meant that there were inevitably some teething issues in the use of technology and how students were taught. Students were quick to criticise. 

Pre-pandemic, it was already clear that universities were not putting education technology to use successfully. A 2019 YouGov report surveyed more than 1,000 students on the use of technology in the classroom, and only 11% of students said technology at their institutions was ‘innovative’. Though the pandemic has accelerated the adoption of technology in the classroom, it’s likely that, for many universities, not much has changed in that time with regards to the complexity of technology and how it’s being used.

Reviews from the EDUopinions website emphasise how students have reacted to the switch to online learning. One bachelor’s student of international business in the Netherlands, for example, explained their disappointment at the lack of contact between students and professors online. They also mentioned that the reliance on pre-recorded lectures has reduced engagement and participation in their course. 

Generation Z students – those currently graduating from university – are perhaps our most technologically advanced generation so far. These students want technology that is reliable and easily accessible. Universities must keep up with these demands if they want to continue to use digital technology in the classrooms for their bachelor’s degrees. 

A volatile graduate jobs market

As well as adapting to online learning, undergraduate students have also had to face the prospect of a more difficult jobs market on graduation. Before the pandemic hit, only half of graduates had confidence in their ability to find a job, but this has since dropped to a third, according to a survey of those in the UK from YouGov.

An annual report from the UK’s Institute of Student Employers (formerly the Association of Graduate Recruiters) also lays bare the scale of competition within the graduate jobs market. Its research shows that up to 90 candidates are now fighting for every graduate job. With so much competition for roles, it makes sense that graduates are reconsidering how to stand out from the crowd. For many, this means looking at the value of their bachelor’s degree and how well it has prepared them for a volatile skills market. 

Students are reassessing the value of their skills as well as how they can make themselves more employable. Even if graduates do secure a job or internship, the subsequent job retention has also been down because of the pandemic. Research from graduate careers organisation, Prospects, has revealed that among final-year students who secured a job post-graduation, 29% of them have subsequently lost them. An additional 28% of students have had their graduate job deferred or rescinded and 26% have lost their internships. It begs the questions, ‘are bachelor’s degrees preparing students fully for the unpredictable world of work?’ and, ‘could universities and Business Schools be doing more to give students the skills to rebound from job losses and succeed with future job applications?’

Many Business Schools already have a careers or jobs service that students can refer to during their studies. However, in a period of sustained economic downturn, it’s no longer enough for these to be voluntary. Careers need to be an integral part of the degree. In research from the University of Greenwich Students’ Union, students specifically asked for more guidance on the transition from graduation to full-time careers and requested that recruitment fairs be held throughout the year. More and more, students are looking to their degrees for not just technical skills, but job skills. Those that fail to provide this – especially during periods of jobs market volatility – will undoubtedly see trust in their institutions and bachelor’s degrees fall. 

Value for money 

Lockdowns have forced universities to close and move many classes entirely online, causing students to question their degree’s value for money. Although tuition fees have largely remained the same, many are calling for a change in what they pay while students have little or no access to campus facilities like libraries, careers services and department offices.

According to a 2020 survey from the Higher Education Policy Institute last year, 31% of students considered their courses poor or very poor value, up from 29% in 2019. The Office for Students – the independent regulator of higher education in England – noted in a keynote address in June 2021 that they had received more than 400 notifications from students and staff members since the outbreak of the pandemic relating to course satisfaction. Chief Executive, Nicola Dandridge, concluded that while online learning provides some benefits, face-to-face teaching is equally, and if not more, important for students. 

Dissatisfaction is noticeably more pronounced in the UK, where tuition fees for university education are now the highest among the world’s most influential countries. However, students elsewhere in Europe also believe that the value for money at their universities has decreased over the course of the pandemic, to date. One business administration student in Germany described, on EDUopinions, how their course content has decreased because of the pandemic, adding to other issues including a lack of communication and disorganised staff. 

How can institutions adapt?

From these trends, it’s clear that demands are shifting. Students want greater access to education through technology, to be better prepared for the jobs market, and to get more out of their tuition fees. But what does this all mean for universities and Business Schools? 

While we’re not yet at the stage where universities are set to decrease tuition fees for courses that mainly take place online, it’s true that more needs to be done to improve the value for money of bachelor’s degrees. We don’t yet know the future disruption that Covid-19 could bring, and universities need to be prepared for future bouts of online learning. This is especially true for business degrees, in which elements of in-person networking and group learning that often rely on a campus presence are crucial. Investment in more advanced education technology that can allow Business Schools to come closer to replicating real-world events online is therefore important. 

Outside the trends investigated here, students are also increasingly seeing the value in having diverse voices in the classroom – and online learning is a valuable tool to accelerate diversity in the classroom. While the switch to digital tools over the pandemic has had some teething issues, many students have welcomed the greater access to education that this has brought. In particular, disabled students have applauded long-awaited progress in flexibility and online learning. Now, many are hoping that digital tools remain a permanent feature of university life. For those who struggle to make it to on-campus lessons – because of health concerns or other constraints on their time, like work or caring responsibilities – online learning has been a blessing. 

To further improve access to education, it’s clear that universities should continue investing in online tools, and improving the flexibility of their bachelor’s degrees. This could mean introducing more part-time programmes, or simply broadening course availability so that some modules can be taken online while others remain tied to in-person teaching. 

However, improving accessibility is useless without also improving student support. In one EDUopinions review, a student in the Netherlands lamented that attendance policies did not accommodate those who felt uncomfortable returning to campus, yet at the same time it was impossible to obtain disability support or reasonable accommodation. As long as universities continue with a hybrid learning model but fail to support students who need more access to online resources, they won’t be offering students exactly what they want and need.

In terms of course content, it’s also obvious that bachelor’s degrees need to do more to encourage soft skills acquisition, as well as the technical skills required. Universities and Business Schools have always had a duty to prepare students for the outside world, but this has never before been tested in such a volatile economic period. Improved employability resources could encompass an increase in compulsory careers sessions starting from the first year of every bachelor’s degree, plus an increase in recruitment fairs, both on-campus and online. 

However, it may also be that bachelor’s degrees introduce additional modules on employability in the form, perhaps, of employment workshops and additional activities to improve soft skills. This level of preparing for employment is already available on many MBA courses, where students often complete a mandatory leadership or soft skills module. Introducing this to more programmes at the undergraduate level would go some way to preparing students for the future jobs market, no matter how unpredictable the economy might be when they graduate.

The future of bachelor’s degrees in business 

In the future, it’s clear that bachelor’s degrees are more likely to occupy a hybrid space – partly on-campus, and partly online. Tools like online discussion boards could help to keep students up to date even where they’re not at university, while the increased use of videoconferencing tools will also improve access to global conferences and other international opportunities, meaning a student’s experiences are no longer limited to the country they are in. Bachelor’s degrees may also feature additional courses on employability to secure job prospects. 

The changes in student demands also represent an opportunity for Business Schools to become more accessible and make university education more egalitarian. Make online learning a mainstay of bachelor’s degrees and you also offer opportunities to students who would otherwise not be able to make it onto a full-time campus programme, further diversifying the classroom. Introducing more mandatory employability sessions can also contribute to boosting social mobility by helping disadvantaged students into high-earning careers. A change in student priorities does not need to be seen as the death of the traditional bachelor’s degree, but as an opportunity for innovation and change. 

Jordi Robert-Ribes is CEO at student reviews platform, EDUopinions. Jordi holds a PhD in telecommunications engineering and a graduate diploma in finance management.

This article is taken from Business Impact’s print magazine (edition: February 2022-April 2022).

Translate »